|~|
Thanks to Rihab’s insomina, I can ‘confidently’ say that I am outgoing, sometimes goofy, - fair is the name of the game - generally friendly and trusting yet have a healthy dose of cynicism, my openess to new experiences is medium, though generally broad minded when it comes to new things, I - in no way - would ever approve of nor tolerate things that cross the moral line, I am suspicious of anything too wacky (that includes people too!) yet I do hold a strong appreciation for creativity for I consider it a virtue. Allow me to strongly disagree with my 4 - neuroticism. I am living a lively and a very high life 
Here is the full report:
***My Five Factor Personality Profile***
Extroversion: You have high extroversion.
You are outgoing and engaging, with both strangers and friends.
You truly enjoy being with people and bring energy into any situation.
Enthusiastic and fun, you’re the first to say “let’s go!”
Conscientiousness: You have medium conscientiousness.
You’re generally good at balancing work and play.
When you need to buckle down, you can usually get tasks done.
But you’ve been known to goof off when you know you can get away with it.
Agreeableness: You have medium agreeableness.
You’re generally a friendly and trusting person.
But you also have a healthy dose of cynicism.
You get along well with others, as long as they play fair.
Neuroticism: You have high neuroticism.
It’s easy for you to feel shaken, worried, or depressed.
You often worry, and your worries prevent you from living life fully.
You tend to be emotionally reactive and moody. Your either flying very high or feeling very low.
Openness to experience: Your openness to new experiences is medium.
You are generally broad minded when it come to new things.
But if something crosses a moral line, there’s no way you’ll approve of it.
You are suspicious of anything too wacky, though you do still consider creativity a virtue.
…The first few days, it felt very weird being without a working (or semi working at times) phone. It was very frustrating … I couldn’t use my phone at all… It felt as if something was missing… Calling customer care was even more frustrating … (1) each time I called, I got a different answer, (2) each time I called, I had to explain the problem from the start … [whatever happened to keeping notes in the system?!] I grew tired of repeating myself, so I stopped calling, (3) T-mobile service sucks!
)
… 
) To the men and women who made Dada art, the meaning didn’t matter.
Marcel Duchamp’s version of Mona Lisa is a prime example of the Dada spirit. Beloved as a beautiful painting that is mysterious, intriguing and compelling, Leonardo da Vinci’s classic Mona Lisa was hated by some Dadaists because it had become a sacred cow — no longer appreciated as a painting, but instead, commodified on postcards, posters and coffee mugs. Marcel Duchamp took a reproduction of da Vinci’s painting, and drew a moustache and goatee on her face. Duchamp’s audacity became a Dada statement. Ironically, Duchamp’s daring deviltry itself became a classic — widely replicated on postcards, posters and mugs.
In 1917, Duchamp created one of his “ready-made” works — again in the spirit of challenging what society defined as art. A mass-produced object — in this case a sparkling white porcelain urinal bought from a plumbing supplier — was turned on its side, signed, and called “Fountain.” When Duchamp tried to enter it in a New York exhibition, it was refused. Paris museum director Alfred Packmon observes that Duchamp and the Dadaists were making the point that art was no longer just a nice bunch of flowers on the wall: “The artist is the person who decides what is art and what is not art.” 
