I don’t recall the last time I sat down and actually wrote pages and pages of hand-written notes. I take a good amount of notes in meetings, and use pen and paper for certain projects for work, but the time spent using pen and paper as opposed to typing is considerably very little. 

I must note that I have very strange hand writing. It’s never consistent. Sometimes I slant to the right, others to the left and other times I don’t slant at all. My signature is another issue. I cannot get a consistent signature! Another critical point, I strongly believe the pen type and color has a lot to do with the handwriting’s appearnce! 

Today, while having my lunch, I decided to take a handwriting analysis. Here, the results:

1. The writer has a potential to be an actor or an athlete. (I have to leave this part out because my father might be reading!)
2. The sample indicates a fight against depression. It seems that there is some diffficulty in expressing emotions and in adapting to various ciscumstances
3.  He/she is moody, quick tempered and has an unpredictable nature.He/she possess vitality, tenderness and sprituality
4. The writer has obliging manners. He/she is a schemer,a hypocrite and is defensive. He/she is a good observer. He/she is to some extent a genuine giver.
5. The person has a tendency of sympathiziing and is of understanding nature. The person seems to be insecure, and somewhat hesitant. The sample is indicative of an unadventurous person,one who takes little risks, sticks to a consistent plan, and has a systamatic nature.
6. Superficiality, idealism are prominent from the writing. Qualities such as versatility, tolerance and disorganization are revealed. Impatience and impulsiveness is reflected from the writing. There is a tendency for the person to be unrealistic in nature
7. It appears that the mother had more influence on writer’s life. The writer seems to be a diplomat, difficult to get to know and quite aloof. At home he/she seems to be a warmer person.
8. There is an indication of progressiveness, extroversion and new ideas in doodler’s nature. There is an indication of a more passive at the same time flexible person. The person desires attention and perhaps is indicative of a swollen ego.
9. The writer is a honest person. The writer is more secretive and less open.

Now, back to the question of should I?! should I be deeply offended by such absurdity? Allright, I am impatient…but I am not a hypocrite! nor am I insecure. I care about looks, okay…but that certainly doesn’t make me superficial! Notice the spelling mistakes above? The contradictions? The complete BS?

Oh, I just remembered reading the following in the instructions: This is more fun and TP than some serious introspection into one’s personality - so don’t come back with a lawsuit for defamation or whatever.

What’s ‘TP?’