Attitude…

Under: Random Thoughts, Uncategorized @ 10:03 pm on Thursday, 12.21.06

To reflect and… Act. The difference between the poor countries and the rich ones is not the age of the country. This can be shown by countries like India & Egypt, that are more than 2000 years old and are poor.

On the other hand, Canada, Australia & New Zealand, that 150 years ago were inexpressive, today are developed countries and are rich.

The difference between poor & rich countries does not reside in the available natural resources. Japan has a limited territory, 80% mountainous, inadequate for agriculture & cattle raising, but it is the second world economy.

The country is like an immense floating factory, importing raw material from the whole world and exporting manufactured products. Another example is Switzerland, which does not plant cocoa but has the best chocolate of the world. In its little territory they raise animals and plant the soil during 4 months per year. Not enough, they produce dairy products of the best quality. It is a small country that transmits an image of security, order & labor, which made it the world’s strong safe.

Executives from rich countries who communicate with their counterparts in poor countries show that there is no significant intellectual difference. Race or skin color are also not important: immigrants labeled lazy in their countries of origin are the productive power in rich European countries.

What is the difference then?

The difference is the attitude of the people, framed along the years by the education & the culture. On analyzing the behavior of the people in rich & developed countries, we find that the great majority follow the following principles in their lives:

1. Ethics, as a basic principle.
2. Integrity.
3. Responsibility.
4. Respect to the laws & rules.
5. Respect to the rights of other citizens.
6. Work loving.
7. Strive for saving & investment.
8. Will of super action.
9. Punctuality.

In poor countries, only a minority follow these basic principles in their daily life.We are not poor because we lack natural resources or because nature was cruel to us. We are poor because we lack attitude. We lack the will to comply with and teach these functional principles of rich & developed societies.

I got this email from Janet (a friend) …I tend to believe it’s true for the most part - especially when looking at the attitudes of us Arabs in our countries. We cannot even form a single file line, we cannot even respect a sign, or a traffic light, we nag and complain about not being productive due to lack of resources, but the truth is we lack the drive needed to make things happen, we could be way too generous when it comes to the wrong things, we’re very lazy and we’re hardly ever on time!

2 Comments »

Saad

12.21.06 @ 10:36 pm

If only more Arabs would respect traffic lights… prosperity would be just around the corner. :) By the way, is India really a poor country? Although a significant proportion of its population lives below the poverty line, the country is still on its way to becoming the next superpower along with China. So where does that leave Arabs, you ask? Beats me. But if the Arab world really wants to build successful societies then they have to learn how to produce chocolate that is even tastier than anything the Swiss can produce. Like an Arabic chocolate or something. Or how about a chocolate shawarma? :) Oh how the Swiss must be quivering with fear at the thought of having to compete with The Chocolate Shawarma. :)

Rihab

12.23.06 @ 5:28 am

yup education is the keyword. education has a tremondous influence on our general approach and attitudes in life - even within developed countries there is a difference between those with who are educated and those who receive little/lower quality education.

the truth is, since you’re a kid you’re taught that there are things you can read there are things you can’t read, there are things you can criticise, and there are things you can’t criticise, there are people you can criticise and people you can’t criticise, there are issues you can question and there are issues you can’t question. when you have such restrictions in thought you stifle creativity, which is the instigator of change and development in society, and when society becomes static in its thoughts and rigidly opposes any outer influence, viewing it as a threat, it rots and brings about its slow demise.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>